<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Malawi’s Food Production Subsidy Coupons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://africa.ipsterraviva.net/2009/09/03/malawi%e2%80%99s-food-production-subsidy-coupons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://africa.ipsterraviva.net/2009/09/03/malawi%e2%80%99s-food-production-subsidy-coupons/</link>
	<description>The Independent Family of Publications from Inter Press Service</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 11:31:01 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brett Davidson</title>
		<link>http://africa.ipsterraviva.net/2009/09/03/malawi%e2%80%99s-food-production-subsidy-coupons/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 08:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://africa.ipsterraviva.net/?p=562#comment-20</guid>
		<description>You might be interested in a new paper by Frank Ellis of the Regional Hunger and Vulnerability Programme (RHVP) on the debate over fertiliser subsidies vs cash transfers. Ellis argues that while fertiliser subsidies have a number of benefits, they also have limitations, and should not be seen as an alternative for other social protection measures for the poor — most notably, social cash transfers (pensions and child support grants, for example). See &lt;a href=&quot;http://wahenga.wordpress.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://wahenga.wordpress.com/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might be interested in a new paper by Frank Ellis of the Regional Hunger and Vulnerability Programme (RHVP) on the debate over fertiliser subsidies vs cash transfers. Ellis argues that while fertiliser subsidies have a number of benefits, they also have limitations, and should not be seen as an alternative for other social protection measures for the poor — most notably, social cash transfers (pensions and child support grants, for example). See <a href="http://wahenga.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://wahenga.wordpress.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

